3 February 2006
In this Update:
RWA Draft Employment and Enterprise Plan Consultation Ends 28th February
RWA Built Environment Plan sent to Cabinet
AHC Pemulwuy Application to go to Department of Planning
RWA Starts processing Development Applications
REDWatch makes FOI application for Street Team Evaluation Report
Other Human Service Developments
Consultation and Engagement – The Outstanding Issues
No Stabling Yards Meeting - Burren Street Reserve (Children’s Park) Monday 6th February at 6:30pm
The Housing Communities Assistance Program (HCAP) Update
Connect Redfern - Updated Children & Family Services Lists Available
Coming Events (entered on the REDWatch website)
Happy New Year and Welcome to year two of the RWA - our apologies for the backlog that has built up during the Christmas New Year break.
RWA Draft Employment and Enterprise
Plan Consultation Ends 28th February
Since we
advised that the RWA had released the Draft Employment & Enterprise Plan (PDF 177kb) for
consultation the RWA have released a January RWA Update (PDF 140Kb) outlining some details of
the Draft Plan. The RWA Update announces that one part of the plan involves the
creation of a hospitality training centre in North Eveleigh
specialising in Indigenous Australian Cuisine. Raymond and Jennice Kersh,
formerly of Edna’s Table, will spearhead this program along with Aboriginal
elder and caterer Beryl Van-Oploo. The enterprise will be known as Yaama
Dhinawan which means Welcome Emu in Aunty Beryl’s Yuwaalaraay language.
The
Employment and Enterprise Plan will be very important to ensure that all,
especially the disadvantaged living in the area, will benefit from the 17,000
jobs the RWA expects to be created from urban renewal in Redfern Waterloo.
While the Plan makes it clear this is the RWA’s intention, it is also apparent
that with the Commonwealth welfare changes trying to force many parents of
school age children and pensioners in the area into employment that the RWA will
have a large job ensuring appropriate training and job opportunities for all
local people who will need it.
Organisations
with experience in job and enterprise creation and training, as well as local
residents should take the opportunity to make their comments to the RWA about
the draft Plan. We are aware that there is again concern about the lack of
consultation involved in the preparation of this Plan but we urge everyone to
make constructive suggestions on how the Draft EE Plan can be strengthened. A
workable EE Plan is crucial for the area. Responses need to be back to
the RWA by 28th February.
As with the
Human Services plan we would encourage people to also send a copy of their
submission or comments to REDWatch so your comments can be shared with others.
Comments about the EE Plan can also be placed on the REDWatch site at http://www.redwatch.org.au/discussion-forum
. In the interests of transparency the RWA should make all submissions for the
EE Plan consultation public.
RWA Built Environment Plan sent to Cabinet
The January
RWA Update also announced that the draft Built Environment (BE) Plan has been
sent to cabinet prior to being put on public exhibition in February for two months.
The Built Environment Plan along with the Human Services Plan and the
Employment and Enterprise Plan together will make up the Redfern Waterloo Plan.
REDWatch
has been told that the Built Environment Plan will be on exhibition
simultaneously with a State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) for Redfern
Waterloo and other planning instruments will follow. The RWA has said that when
the BE Plan is released that proposed land uses, heights and floor space
rations will be available so that the community can see exactly what the RWA is
proposing and debate the issues.
AHC Pemulwuy Application to go to Department of Planning
The AHC had
almost finalised their DA for the Pemulwuy Project when the Department of
Planning exercised their right to request the AHC to submit a Project
Application (a concept master plan) for the proposed development to the
Department of Planning for assessment. Given all the work done to date we are
told this is quite a straight forward process and a meeting has been scheduled
with the Department of Planning over the PA. The assessment by the Department
of Planning will see the project being assessed on the same basis as any other
private development project irrespective of who may live in the project or how
it might be financed.
AHC CEO
Michael Mundine says he is keen to see plans for the future of the Block and
the Pemulwuy project finalised this year with the RWA. The release of the RWA’s
Built Environment Plan, including proposed land usages, floor space ratios and
heights for the Block should provide some indications of what the Minister
would prefer to have in the Block precinct. Hopefully both parties will be able
to sit down, talk seriously and resolve their differences this year.
RWA Starts processing Development Applications
In October
2005, the Minister for Planning delegated to the Redfern-Waterloo Authority a
range of consent authority functions under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act (EP&A Act). These functions include the ability to
assess and process Development Applications formerly undertaken by the
Department of Planning and a determination role for certain Development
Applications. It will only apply to developments which in the Minister’s
opinion have a capital investment of not more than $5 million on
Redfern-Waterloo Authority sites identified in State Environmental Planning
Policy (Major Projects) 2005. In addition, the Director General of the
Department of Planning has delegated a number of functions to the RWA. These
include the preparation, consultation and
adoption of Urban Development Plans and Master Plans under Sydney Regional
Environmental Plan 26 – City West. Further information on the delegations can
be downloaded from http://www.redwatch.org.au/RWA/statements/2006/delegations060203
(17KB).
In early
January the RWA posted the first four Development Applications (DAs) to be
handled by the RWA on their website. Readers of the Sydney Courier Central of January
11 will have also found out that two DAs were available for inspection at the
Sydney Council’s Redfern Neighbourhood Service Centre although the RWA website
still makes no reference to this method of viewing the DAs. The other two DAs
not advertised are fit-outs at the ATP that also need to be notified.
One of the
DAs covers a proposal to add a Vodafone “phone network facility on rooftop
and inside the plant room of the Biomedical
Building” at the ATP.
From the RWA Development Proposals on Exhibition website you can download the
proposal for this DA in pdf form. Exhibition ends 6 February 2006.
The second
DA covers the “construction of a pedestrian platform, access structure
and sub-station enclosure to service the new Contemporary Performing Arts
Complex within the Carriage Works Building and the North Eveleigh site” at
the end of Codrington St Darlington. It is regrettable that no
electronic copy of this DA is available and currently only the paper version is
available for inspection. A quick flick through the documents late one
afternoon indicated that what is not mentioned in the advertised notice is that
this DA seeks to change an aspect of the DA granted by the City of Sydney in December 2004
for this development. The change reflects the RWA decision to retain the
building to the east of the proposed entrance and necessitates the historical
documentation and removal of the First Aid Station that sits where the entrance
is now proposed. Exhibition ends 6 February 2006.
We have
been advised that the RWA is aiming to have PDFs of all DAs available so that
they can be easily accessed by residents after hours over the internet. It is
imperative that this be done so residents can easily obtain a copy of the DA
rather than have to photocopy pages to take away from the service centre.
We have
asked the RWA for some clarification on procedures for notification of DA’s and
have received the following information from them regarding the DA notification
process:
The requirement for advertising and notification of Development Applications within the Redfern-Waterloo Authority (RWA) sites are determined by the:
- Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000
- Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 26-City West (SREP 26)
- City of Sydney
Notification of Planning and Development Applications Development Control
Plan 2005 (City of Sydney
Notification DCP)
Over
the next few months RWA will be preparing an Advertising and Notification
Development Control Plan to replace the City of Sydney Notification DCP and advertising
provisions in SREP 26.
RWA
policy is for all Development Applications to be notified to the owners or
occupiers of adjoining land by way of a letter.
As
specified in SREP 26 (clause 51), for development undertaken within sites
subject to SREP 26, if the development would cause irreversible harm to a
heritage item, or does not confirm to a master plan or would have a significant
environmental effect, the Development Application will be also be advertised in
the local paper for a minimum of 21 days.
For
all other sites (not subject to SREP 26) the City of Sydney Notification DCP will apply and will
be advertised in accordance with the DCP.
All
Development Applications on exhibition will be posted on the RWA website and
the Development Application can be viewed by the public at the Redfern
Neighbourhood Service Centre (Tower 2, 1 Lawson Street, Redfern).
REDWatch makes FOI application for Street Team Evaluation Report
You may
recall last year we were pushing for the Redfern Waterloo Street Team (RWST)
Evaluation to be released. In December 2005 the RWA amended the Human Services
Plan to reference the RWST Evaluation as part of the basis for its proposed
reorganisation of youth services. It hence became even more important for the
community and service providers to understand why this government initiative,
praised in the NSW Government Submission to the Inquiry into Redfern Waterloo,
failed and what was learnt from this government foray into local youth service
provision.
A number of
people had been told that at least the Executive Summary would be released even
if there were privacy issues with the main report. We have now been advised by
the RWA that this report will not be released and that the only way that it
will be available is for interested people to request it under FOI. This
potentially means those requesting the document pay the RWA an hourly rate to
remove any sensitive material in the report so it can be released.
REDWatch
has lodged an FOI application with the $30 application fee to the RWA for the
RWST evaluation. REDWatch has also asked that the report be made available
without the additional per hour costs being charged given the importance of the
report and its reference in the Human Services Plan. We will let you know the
outcome.
Other Human Service Developments
The RWA
appears to have been a bit optimistic about getting the phase two consultations
of the Human Services Plan off the ground in December 2005. A proposal for the
second round; services for migrant communities, the aged, people with
disabilities and homeless people are expected to go to the Human Services
Advisory Committee in February 2006. There appears to be a strong view in the
community that firm decisions should not be made about the future of Rachel
Foster Hospital until the second round of Human Services consultations are
completed and proposals as to how these needs are to be met have been planned
for.
In December
we passed on news that the RWA had indicated a preparedness to write to those
who had made submissions about the Draft Human Services Plan to get permission
to make their submissions public so the community could see what was presented
to the RWA regarding the changes required. To date we have not heard of any
letters being received and the submissions have not been released. We would be
interested to know for example which submission encouraged the removal of “an
independent human services expert, a local person with knowledge of the human
services system and a local human services provider” from the Implementation
Group. This is especially so as we now hear that the $800,000 from the Street
Team will not necessarily be going back into youth services and that the
decision about what will happen with those resources will be made by the
Implementation Working Group now made up of entirely Government
representatives.
In addition
to announcing Cabinet’s approval of the Human Services plan the January RWA Update (PDF 140 Kb) announced that a Youth
Taskforce had been established by the RWA along with a ‘Street Drinking
Taskforce”. A Midnight Basketball competition, sponsored by the RWA,
involving local young people aged 12 to 18 will be run on Saturday nights
between 7.30pm and midnight starting 8th February.
Finally
outside the RWA there have been some wider changes in DoCS policy which have
raised concerns among neighbourhood centres that centres under $1million will
be squeezed from the DoCS funding. These concerns have been taken up by Eastern
Suburbs, Inner City and Inner West Neighbourhood Centre Forum in a recent letter
to DoCS. In other developments an Industry Roundtable meeting held before
Christmas 2005 decided to establish a Taskforce chaired by Sir Marcus Einfeld
to look the effect of the changes to the sector resulting from the Federal Work
Place Changes. A report on this meeting can also be found on the REDWatch
website.
Consultation and Engagement – the Outstanding Issues
To have
produced three Plans for consultation in just over a year is a Herculean effort
by the RWA from a standing start. It shows that the RWA is certainly planning
to get things done in Redfern Waterloo. There is concern however that this
speed has been made possible at the cost of minimal community involvement in
the making of the Plans. The RWA and the Minister have taken the view that
consultation is best held around firm proposals, so consultations have largely
waited until after the Plan is produced.
There have
been many studies done on Redfern Waterloo, including that by the RWPP and the
RED Strategy study, so there was much that did not need to be repeated. The RWA
has been able to use this material and the governments wider Metropolitan
Strategy in formulating their plans for Redfern Waterloo. What is of concern is
that prior to the Plans being worked up by the RWA there was no process of
community consultation to check the synthesis of the information and to make
sure the work started with as complete a picture as possible. Nor was there any
process of involving the community in weeding out the problems associated with
some of the earlier studies and consultations. Finally there was no community
articulation of its own priorities as distinct from the priorities the RWA has
in mind. Instead we have fully worked up Plans for public consultation and it
difficult to go back and question some of the underlying assumptions, omissions
and priorities.
The Human
Services Plan was a bit different as there was community meeting and cluster
group meetings in the early part of the process but by the time it got into a
final form there did not appear to be much room for anything to be changed in
the consultation as the various departments had already signed off on the Plan.
With the Draft EE and BE Plans there has not been open community input
processes. There should be plenty to talk about and it will be possible to see
if the RWA will enter into a broad dialogue with the community or if it will
try to drive change in Redfern Waterloo with little real engagement with the
local community.
Now that
there are firm proposals on the table we can expect that the Minister will hold
the first of his the promised Community Forums. There are problems with
Community Forums as a mechanism for detailed input from the community but this
is the mechanism the Minister has chosen for the community to let him know
their views. The sooner the Minister starts regular meetings with the Redfern
Waterloo communities the better for both the RWA and the community as both can
only benefit from dialogue.
REDWatch
Following
the January REDWatch meeting with RWA CEO Robert Domm,
working groups have been set up to develop a response to the Draft EE Plan as
well as considering the BE Plan. If you are interested in being involved in
these groups contact Trevor Davies
on 0400008338 for the Employment and Enterprise Plan or Geoff Turnbull on 9318
0824 for the Built Environment Plan or make comments by contacting mail@redwatch.org.au
At the
February Meeting REDWatch will finalise its submission for the Draft Employment
and Enterprise Plan and also discuss the Built Environment Plan that should be
released by then.
REDWatch is
open to interested residents and friends of Redfern Eveleigh Darlington and Waterloo and everyone is
welcome to come along and be involved in the discussion and to get involved in
the group. REDWatch next meets at The Factory, 67 Raglan Street Waterloo
on Sunday 26th February 2006 at 2pm.
No Stabling Yards Meeting - Burren Street Reserve
(Children’s Park) Monday 6th February at 6:30pm
RailCorp
has appointed a new Precinct Manager, Colin Coakley, to the Stabling Yards
project. Colin will be attending the meeting on Monday to update them on where
TIDC is at with the REF process and what happens next. His aim (assuming the
project goes ahead) is to find a solution that works for residents and
Railcorp. Colin also has meetings scheduled with both the Marrickville and Sydney City
councils. For more information on the proposed Stabling Yards see http://www.redwatch.org.au/RWA/statesignificant/stabling/
or email Kym, Gaynor, Gretchen or Penny on no_stabling_yards@yahoo.com.au
The Housing Communities Assistance Program (HCAP) Update
The HCAP
Programme is now operating from the Factory Community Centre. An information
sheet has been produced providing some background to what HCAP is doing in
Redfern Waterloo. The information can be downloaded from http://www.redwatch.org.au/redw/ngos/hcap/download
(Word 91KB).
The Redfern
and Waterloo Neighbourhood Advisory Boards bi-monthly newsletter, RedWater
News, also will be ongoing with the new HCAP arrangement. RedWater is
distributed to every household on the Redfern and Waterloo estates. An Editorial Committee made
up of tenants, the HCAP worker, and the worker from the University of New South
Wales Community Development Project produce the
newsletter. RedWater News publishes articles of interest to tenants including
local tenant initiatives, tenancy issues, tenant profiles, local events and
activities. Please contact Orna Marks at the Factory on 02 9698 9569 if have
any suggestions for RedWater news.
Connect Redfern - Updated Children & Family
Services Lists Available
Connect Redfern issue a number of lists (updated at
the beginning of each school term) for Children and Family services in Redfern
Waterloo. We have posted the most recent listings at http://www.redwatch.org.au/redw/services/connectredfern
. If you are looking for local services you can also access major community
services databases from http://www.redwatch.org.au/redw/services .
Coming
Events
Events are
being added to the website as we hear about them. Follow this link to see the
coming events: http://www.redwatch.org.au/events_listing