You are here: Home / Updates / 06 June 2005

06 June 2005

Protest in Support of Aboriginal Housing on the Block / REDWatch Produces Statement on “How to Plan for Redfern-Waterloo” / SMH Campaign for Sydney reveals possible Devastation for Redfern / Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (Infrastructure and other Planning Reform) Bill 2005 / Public Private Partnerships (PPPs)/ Staff Changes at the RWA / Human Service Cluster Group Reports / “What’s with Domestic Violence?” - forum Thursday 16 June 2005 from 9.30 am – 2.00 pm / The Lawson Street Health Centre Debacle / Redfern Oval / Other Recent Redfern Waterloo Mentions in Parliament / Consultation on Redfern Health Facility – Clover’s eNews
Follow the links below to go direct to the story of interest:

Protest in Support of Aboriginal Housing on the Block

REDWatch Produces Statement on “How to Plan for Redfern-Waterloo”

SMH Campaign for Sydney reveals possible Devastation for Redfern

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (Infrastructure and other Planning Reform) Bill 2005

Public Private Partnerships (PPPs)

Staff Changes at the RWA

Human Service Cluster Group Reports

“What’s with Domestic Violence?” - forum Thursday 16 June 2005 from 9.30 am – 2.00 pm

The Lawson Street Health Centre Debacle

Redfern Oval

Other Recent Redfern Waterloo Mentions in Parliament

Consultation on Redfern Health Facility – Clover’s eNews


Protest in Support of Aboriginal Housing on the Block - Bridge Walk & Candle Light Vigil this Thursday 9th June at 6.30pm


The Bridge Walk & Candle Light Vigil this Thursday 9th June meets at 6.30pm in front of the RWA offices and then moves off at 7pm to The Block is shaping up to be a major protest action. The Government’s decision, gazetted last week, to take over the planning controls for the Block has incensed not only Aboriginal people but many people of good will within the wider community including churches, unions and political parties. The Bridge walk, while only walking a short distance from the RWA office to the Block across the Lawson Street Railway bridge, is aimed to remind people of the hundreds of thousands of people who turned out around Australia on bridge walks for Reconciliation 5 years ago. Originally it was organised by Redfern Residents for Reconciliation with the backing of some of the local Aboriginal and non Aboriginal churches to support the building of Aboriginal Housing on the Block. The recent announcement that the main opponent of the Pemulwuy project now has control over what is allowed to be built on the Block, has widened support substantially.


The inclusion of the Block and private property surrounding it in the initial RWA gazettal makes clear that the RWA wants to re-develop this whole area and a sizable Aboriginal residential population is not part of the Minister’s Plan. The last couple of hundred years of Australian history has seen Aboriginal people being pushed off their land because it has been wanted by the more powerful colonisers who thought they could do “better” things with it than the original custodians. This is resurfacing today in Redfern over the Block and it can not be allowed to happen again. This time we can not hide behind our ancestors, if we let it happen we ourselves are definitely responsible.


Please spread the word among your friends about the March and Vigil and come along and show your opposition to Frank’s move. The leaflet for the protest can be downloaded from the REDWatch website at http://www.redwatch.org.au/links/candlevigil RRR.doc. If you are a delegate to the ALP State Conference over the long weekend please also support the move for the Government to support the Pemulwuy Aboriginal Housing on the Block.


Spin from around the RWA at present is that the Minister is not opposed to Aboriginal Housing on the Block and that he has offered to build some. This refers to the Minister’s “take it or leave it” offer to the AHC board a few months ago in which he offered to build the same number of houses as currently exist on the Block in his broader unspecified iconic development of the Block. The balance of the 62 units planned in the Pemulwuy project is to be provided by the RWA away from the Block. Those familiar with the Block will know that over a period of time most of the houses on the Block have been removed so less than 20 remain. The Minister’s offer was not about trying to put a viable Aboriginal housing project in place on the Block it was about giving a bit of housing on the Block to try to get the AHC to give up the Pemulwuy project’s 62 homes on the Block.


The Minister’s position seems to be that Aboriginal housing on the Block will result in an area of high dependency tenants even thought the Pemulwuy project has provisions to avoid this. Ironically the Minister’s cut down housing numbers will increase the chance of the high dependency tenants in the area that he fears. The Minister’s offer of any Aboriginal housing on the Block was supposed to be the compromise offer between the Pemulwuy project and the Minister’s preference for no housing. The Minister wanted the AHC to work with the RWA to develop a predominantly non-housing vision for the Block. The AHC Board rejected the Minister’s “take it or leave it offer” but this does not appear to have totally killed off the small housing component idea from within the RWA.


The statement by the AHC about the Block being declared state significant can be found at http://www.redwatch.org.au/links/AHC Press Release state significant.doc . The boundary of the area Gazetted as “state significant” can be seen on the REDWatch website at http://www.redwatch.org.au/links/RWA State Significance.pdf .


REDWatch has also written to all state politicians letting them know that all the sites covered in the Parliamentarian’s “See Redfern before Frank Sells It” Tour have been declared State Significant (including the Court House) and hence move a step closer to potentially being sold. We have also invited them to the Bridge walk. A copy of this email http://www.redwatch.org.au/links/MP Vigil Invite no map.doc
& REDWatch Media statements can be seen on the REDWatch website http://www.redwatch.org.au/press/REDWatch Media State Sig 050530-2.doc http://www.redwatch.org.au/press/REDWatch Media State Sig 050530.doc.


REDWatch Produces Statement on “How to Plan for Redfern-Waterloo”


The Redfern Waterloo Plan is to provide the basis for the RWA’s ongoing work. REDWatch has released a statement on “How to Plan for Redfern-Waterloo”. This document was developed by the REDWatch Plan Working Group with the assistance of two planners and lots of ordinary people. It has now been submitted to the Minister and the RWA CEO and been posted on the REDWatch website at http://www.redwatch.org.au/links/REDWatch Plan Statement 050531.pdf .


REDWatch is pushing for the RWA to adopt an integrated planning framework and has made suggestions to the RWA about how to implement it. REDWatch’s main concern with the Plan being rolled out in stages is that only the items that are on the government’s priority list will be addressed and that other issues of concern to the community may never be seen. REDWatch is calling at least for a “Plan in Outline” which provides a framework into which the stages of the Plan can fit. The REDWatch document also includes some Q&A’s on the Plan, some principles for community participation and some ground rules for developing the Plan as well as a suggestion for how the “Plan in Outline” could be put together. We hope that this Statement will be of assistance to people and organisations in putting forward their views on what should happen in the development of the Redfern Waterloo Plan. It may also be useful for others in areas targeted for urban renewal under the Metro Strategy.


SMH Campaign for Sydney reveals possible Devastation for Redfern


For those that only read the SMH on the web you will have missed some interesting information in the SMH’s Campaign for Sydney series last week. The SMH concentrated on the CBD part of the story in “Railway lifeline dead on arrival” at http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Railway-lifeline-dead-on-arrival/2005/05/30/1117305563788.html about the long term MetroWest proposal. The article mentioned that the “Government has not picked a specific route but the plans it does have could seriously affect 44 buildings between Redfern and Town Hall. The article then explored the problems with the line running in to city high rises. It was left to a graphic on the CBD map, which was not on the web, to say “33 buildings south of Cleveland Street may need to be demolished” and “21 buildings south of Cleveland Street may need to be reinforced”. That’s an awful lot of possibly affected buildings for the SMH not to cover in their story!! Maybe it was because they were in Redfern rather than the CBD. Hopefully the RWA is aware of the MetroWest plans but in case they too missed it we suggest they ask for the plans as it sounds like it runs through their newly declared “state significant” land.


Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (Infrastructure and other Planning Reform) Bill 2005


This Bill encompasses the changes being made by the Government to the “state significant” and planning provisions to make development more streamlined. This Bill goes hand in hand with the SEPP which recently defined the RWA’s initial “state significant” boundaries. A quick overview of some of the changes in the legislation can be found in the SMH article
State's largest projects to bypass green laws. These changes apply to the whole state and will interact with the RWA Act and the Minister’s stated commitment for community consultation in determining what ends up unfolding in Redfern Waterloo. There is also now material up on the DIPNR web site about the overall planning changes - http://www.dipnr.nsw.gov.au/planningreform.html . The Bill can be seen at http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/NSWBills.nsf/0/1654915CCC0B8313CA25700B00357577 .


Public Private Partnerships (PPPs)


When the Premier announced the establishment of the RWA special mention was made that the RWA was going to use Public Private Partnerships for the development. In its initial response to the RWA announcement REDWatch called for mechanisms other than PPPs to be investigated for funding the RWA developments. A couple of recent articles provided some background on PPPs and how they work which we thought worthwhile bringing to people’s attention. Following we have provided the links to a recent Australian article www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,15404900,00.html  as well as to a recent ABC background briefing that looked at the operations of Macquarie Bank
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s1376932.htm .


Staff Changes at the RWA


As of July 1 the RWPP will be absorbed completely by the RWA. The changes are well advanced. Michael Ramsey the RWPP director for the last few years finishes with the RWPP on 6th June. We understand at least initially Aldo Pennini will be taking on Michael’s role in addition to his other tasks. Samantha Nolan has also left and her role is currently being taken over by Ross Bennett. We also hear that Indigenous Land Corporation Board Member Norma Ingram is moving from the Premier’s Department to the RWA. With the absorption of the RWPP into the RWA we have requested a list of RWA staff and their areas of responsibility so the community knows who they should be dealing with regarding specific issues of concern to them. We have been assured that such a list will be available as soon as responsibilities of the new staff are finalized. Also expected in the near future is a new well maintained RWA website.


Human Service Cluster Group Reports


We understand that the Cluster Group reports have been finalized and we are advised that they should be posted soon on the RWA / RWPP web site so everyone can see them and not just those involved in a particular cluster. We were hoping they would be up by the time this email went out to provide you with the links. We will let you know when they are up. The human services plan is being put together before it is put out for community consultation.


“What’s with Domestic Violence?” - forum Thursday 16 June 2005 from 9.30 am – 2.00 pm


The Central Sydney Regional Reference Group on Violence Against Women in conjunction with the Inner City Domestic Violence Action Group is holding a forum: “Working together locally to achieve best practice for victims of domestic violence”. The forum will be held on Thursday 16 June 2005 from 9.30 am – 2.00 pm at Redfern Town Hall, 73 Pitt St, Redfern. The program will include a presentation on the Domestic Violence Interagency Guidelines, and also provide the opportunity to develop a strategy for working together. A light lunch will be provided. Those interested in attending or wanting further details should contact Matina Mottee Phone: 9745 8448 or Email: matina.mottee@community.nsw.gov.au by 9th June 2005.


Following the forum at Redfern Town hall at 1 pm there will be an art exhibition by The Women’s Art Expression and Empowerment Group Exhibition of Art with works exploring abuse and empowerment. There will be an auction of one of the artworks following the opening.

 

The Lawson Street Health Centre Debacle

 

There have been a number of developments on this and you can get the latest news articles by visiting http://www.redalert.net.au/news. The Red Alert site also has information about a community meeting they are organising for 2pm on Saturday 18th June at Redfern Town Hall. Clover has also produced a response in her e-news (see bottom of this email)  which advises that Council has requested a Social Impact Assessment Statement for the DA and will re-notify residents about the Development Application (DA) when the State Government has provided this information and consulted the community. Under the transitional measures associated with the declaration of the health centre as “state significant” any DA lodged prior to the date gazettal remains with council and new DAs come under the new arrangements.

 

The Rev Fred Nile has also put a question on the proposed Health Centre and elicited a bit of information from the Hon John Della Bosca Redfern Mobile Needle Syringe Service . “The reality of the situation is that the Redfern area remains at risk of the spread of infectious and blood-borne diseases. I am advised that the HIV rate in Redfern is twice the national average and Redfern also has the most hepatitis C notifications in the central Sydney area. While the number of needles distributed in the area has halved in the past 12 months, due in no small part to the good work of police, a large number of needles are still being distributed in Redfern.” Mr Della Bosca said.

 

From reading the statements from the Minister of Health on 20th May http://www.redalert.net.au/DocsGovt/050516_NSWHealthMinister.pdf and the statement from Mr Della Bosca, one gets the clear impression that there is no intention to change the location of the Centre, no matter what the “community consultation” turns up. This impression would be supported by the Government declaring it “state significant” and taking ultimate planning control away from City of Sydney Council. The Health Minister has said “It is anticipated the program will commence in the coming weeks, with all the key community stakeholders to be informed, including local residents, the Aboriginal Medical Service and the Aboriginal Housing Corporation”. Della Bosca in his statement added “Any amendments that need to be made to the development application following this consultation process will be done”. We think the word “informed” rather than “consulted” is a bit of a give away; as is the mention of amending the DA rather than the possibility of moving the centre.

 

According to Minister Iemma the consultation has been initiated by Minister Sartor who has "commissioned the Sydney South West Area Health Service to develop a community consultation program and timetable”. This at least means that Minister Sartor is in the position to ensure that a proper consultation takes place and he will have to live with the community backlash if all the options are not put on the table and a proper consultation process is not pursued.

 

Redfern Oval

 

Discussions continue with an occasional media mention. Last email we provided the link to Kristina Keneally’s comments in Parliament about the Oval. Clover Moore has responded in Parliament on the issues and to some of Ms Keneally’s comments and these responses can be found at Redfern Oval and Redfern Oval. In a recent development the Metropolitan Land Council has come out in support of the Indigenous Land Council’s proposal which from media reports seems to involve the ILC buying the oval from Council http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Aboriginal-group-wants-to-run-Redfern-Oval/2005/06/03/1117568381281.html. If the City of Sydney was to proceed down this path there would be community pressure to use the money gained to buy up a similar parcel of land in Redfern Waterloo so that the low level of public space, identified in council’s own report on the Oval, would not be further eroded. The next round of discussion by the Council Committee is scheduled for June 20.

 

Other Recent Redfern Waterloo Mentions in Parliament

 

Soon to be local Member for the Block, Andrew Refshauge has finally said something about Redfern, but only in passing when referring to Father Ted’s parish after rising in the house to speak on the death of Father Ted Kennedy. Brad Hazzard also spoke about the death of Father Ted mentioning twice the people of Redfern Death of Father Ted Kennedy.


Arthur Chesterfield Evans spoke fully about the Settlement in introducing amendments the Act that governs the area’s oldest neighbourhood centre Sydney University Settlement Corporation Bill

 

CONSULTATION ON REDFERN HEALTH FACILITY - CLOVER'S eNEWS - Friday 27 May 2005 - No. 248

The Minister for Health has agreed to my request to defer decisions on a proposed health facility in Lawson Street Redfern and to consult with the community before proceeding.

The Redfern-Waterloo Authority will now contract independent consultants to investigate different service options and locations. Council will re-notify residents about the Development Application (DA) when the Government has provided this information and consulted the community.

The City of Sydney has also requested a Social Impact Assessment Statement for the DA, with information about the expected number of patients, where they will come from and impacts on the surrounding area. Council has also asked for a Management Plan to identify and prevent impacts.

When I met with the Minister this week, he said that the existing REPIDU Outreach Van would continue providing clean syringes and responding to drug overdoses in this precinct until a decision is made about the health facility. Public health experts are concerned about the spread of diseases such as Hepatitis C and HIV, and say that a needle exchange service is needed. The Minister said that fewer needles were distributed this year, and that clean syringes were still required.

Drug-related crime and drug use has dropped across NSW, and several local programs have helped. The Magistrates Early Referral Into Treatment (MERIT) program helped 100 young people get into drug treatment during its first year in Redfern. Bail conditions prevent people charged with drug offences returning to Redfern, drug users are being actively diverted at Redfern Railway Station, and strong police action against drug dealers and suppliers in Redfern and Waterloo has resulted in numerous arrests and charges.

Police, Redfern-Waterloo Street Team and youth services are working with young people to prevent them engaging in crime and anti-social behaviour. Council has provided active cleansing and is improving the local parks, and the Redfern Community Centre has a range of positive programs to engage local people.