Log in


Forgot your password?
 
You are here: Home / UrbanGrowth, SMDA & RWA Plans & Activities / RWA Operational Archive / RWA Structure & Committees / Ministerial Advisory Committees Terms of Refernce

Ministerial Advisory Committees Terms of Refernce

The following are the Terms of Reference for the Ministerial Advisory Committees dated 16 June 2005. These Terms of Reference were also circulated to those offered positions on Ministerial Advisory Committees in October 2009. Note the continued inclusion of Item 4 which has has still not been implimented.

Redfern Waterloo

MINISTERIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES TERMS OF REFERENCE

1.                              Built Environment Advisory Committee

Provide advice on urban design, traffic, public access, public transport, land use, affordable housing, public housing, and urban renewal.

Membership: Relevant Government agencies and 6-8 representatives from the local community.

2.                              Employment and Enterprise Advisory Committee

Provide advice on increasing job and business opportunities in the area, including for the Indigenous community.

Membership: Relevant Government agencies and 6-8 representatives from the local community.

3.                              Human Services Advisory Committee

Provide advice on all human services and health issues affecting Redfern‑Waterloo.

Membership: Relevant Government agencies and 6-8 representatives from the local community.

4.                              Community Forums

Provide the Minister with advice on planning for the Redfern Waterloo area and provides the community with a direct link to the Minister. Community Forums would meet at least four times a year and be open to members of the public to attend.

Membership: Community at large.

5.                              Community Representatives on Advisory Committees

Community representatives are to be appointed as individuals and not on an ex-officio basis. Whilst their membership of a local community organisation is a relevant consideration it should not be the basis of their appointment.

16 June 2005