Log in


Forgot your password?
 
You are here: Home / Other RW Issues / Public Housing / Redevelopment / Social Mix - Will it solve the problems? / The Dining Experience in Waterloo and Redfern

The Dining Experience in Waterloo and Redfern

It will be interesting to see how Housing NSW conducts itself and manages the behaviour of its staff and associates/partners in the forthcoming largest Estate Redevelopment it has ever handled, which is scheduled for the Redfern Waterloo area. The area in question has some 4,500 households living in Housing NSW owned and managed properties writes Ross Smith in TSN's Rimfire Review of 8 February 2010 .

The planning was meant to be placed on exhibition in March 2008, according to the Redfern Waterloo Authority, the government authority with planning control for the Public Housing Estates in Redfern and Waterloo. This has not happened to date, despite frequent requests from the public housing tenants as to when it will happen.

Paperwork released by Housing NSW on 21st November 2009 at the Redfern Neighbourhood Advisory Board’s Information Day at the Poet’s Corner complex in Morehead Street Redfern said that Housing NSW will be conducting a thorough consultation process as part of the planning process.

The paperwork also said that there was a desire to achieve more social mix, additional affordable housing, and provision of private homes on the same land mass. This claim is a clear indication that some existing public housing stock will be transferred to the nongovernment housing sector, as will some of the land mass. The fact that the RWA and Housing NSW have said that the towers will be retained without specifying ownership raises the possibility that one or more tower will be transferred from the government owned public housing sector.

Will Waterloo and Redfern be yet another chapter in the Housing NSW Non-compliance and Tenant Abuse book whose first chapter was written in the 1970s in Waterloo, with subsequent chapters covering Minto, Airds, Villawood, Claymore, Mudgee, Chifley, Redfern and South Coogee, to name but a few of the chapters? The NSW Ombudsman has written reviews of some of the chapters.

Time alone will tell. In the interim the public housing tenants of Redfern and Waterloo will have to wait for the pudding to be served before passing final judgement. Past experience has taught them the value of Quick-Eze and Mylanta.

Ross Smith
Waterloo

Reference: www.redwatch.org.au/RWA/statements/2009/091121doh

Source: The RIMFIRE Review is the weekly opinion publication of the National Tenant Support Network. It offers readers an opportunity to say what should be said, as distinct from what can be said, with anonymity, in  the public arena.  You are welcome to submit considered and robust opinion pieces for publication in the RIMFIRE Review, however, final editorial privilege will be vested in the Coordinator of the National TSN.  2007©RIMFIRE REVIEW.

The TSN provides a email service on housing and tenant issues tracking news stories on this issues of interest to tenants and people working in the field. To join the list contact TSN@thenexus.org.au Coordinator: Garry Mallard