RWA Repeal Bill 2011 - Lower House Speaches
Debate resumed from an earlier hour.
Ms LINDA BURNEY (Canterbury) [5.23 p.m.]: I speak on behalf of
the Opposition on the Redfern-Waterloo Authority Repeal Bill 2011. The
proposed amendments to the Growth Centres (Development Corporations) Act
1974 are welcomed by the Opposition because they continue the strategy
and good work of the previous Labor Government in encouraging urban
renewal, including by way of transport reform. I know the member for
Heffron will address that point so I will not dwell on it. I do not make
a political point but this was commenced by the previous Government and
this bill continues that work.
The amendments deal with repealing the Redfern-Waterloo Authority Act
2004 and amending the Growth Centres Act to allow the transfer of
assets, rights, liabilities and certain functions of the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority to the Sydney Metropolitan Development
Authority. On 21 February 2010 the Labor Government announced the
setting up of the new Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority as part
of the wider Metropolitan Transport Plan: Connecting the City of Cities
reforms, which built on the success of the Redfern-Waterloo Authority
model.
I watched with great interest the creation and development of the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority, partly because it was such a new thing to do
and partly because it focused on particular urban areas in Sydney.
Redfern, which is an extraordinary part of Sydney, has a history of
industrialisation. Aboriginal communities settled there in the 1930s and
migrant people moved there when they arrived in Australia, particularly
post-World War I and World War II. Redfern has a colourful history for
many reasons. The Eveleigh Street railway yards are also located at
Redfern, and the redevelopment of that site under the Redfern-Waterloo
Authority has been wonderful to behold. It has added markets and
cultural developments in that part of the world and it has added
cultural developments for the whole city.
The authority has created a new precinct in a part of the city that was
not being used. When one goes down to the Eveleigh Street railway yards
and sees the magnificent way in which the railway yards are being used
to create urban spaces it makes one very proud. It was always our
intention in government to incorporate the Redfern-Waterloo Authority
within the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority to expand on its
capacity to deliver meaningful urban developments, particularly in the
area of transport. The Redfern-Waterloo Authority brings with it to the
Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority a number of key assets that
are of Sydney, regional and state-wide significance.
Those assets include the now iconic Australian Technology Park, which
continues to be a source of innovation excellence for the community and
business. The New South Wales Labor Opposition is watching Australian
Technology Park carefully to see how it progresses under the new
Government. The Australian Technology Park acts as a catalyst for the
development and funding of new intellectual property. This activity lies
at the very heart of long-term job creation momentum in New South Wales
by raising the growth potential of the economy. Indeed, as the global
financial crisis continues to linger into its fourth year the Australian
Technology Park remains crucial in supporting and creating new jobs and
business opportunities.
The Redfern-Waterloo Authority also maintains its jurisdiction over key
development sites at Redfern, Waterloo and the former Carlton United
Brewery site at Broadway. Driving down Broadway one can see the changing
of the brewery site and the development that is going on in that part
of Sydney. Those sites provide the potential to demonstrate the benefits
of medium- and high-density housing in solving Sydney's well-documented
housing supply problems. The Labor Opposition, which has taken into
account the early October Reserve Bank of Australia research paper on
urban structure, believes it is imperative for policy development to
take account of the strong linkages between the planning process, zoning
regulations and housing supply. Of course, that is one of the great
challenges in relation to planning and infrastructure development in New
South Wales, particularly in Sydney.
Without labouring the point, housing supply is a challenge that cannot
be solved by just popping more houses onto the outskirts of Sydney. A
discussion must be had about the culture of housing in our community.
The incorporation of the Redfern-Waterloo Authority into the Sydney
Metropolitan Development Authority importantly maintains key provisions
in relation to the Aboriginal Housing Company. This has been an ongoing
issue in the area known as The Block, but the Aboriginal Housing Company
in Redfern has a lot more stock than just that area; it provides
housing across the inner city. It is important that the key provisions
of the Redfern-Waterloo Authority are contained in the new arrangement
proposed by this bill. It is important for these amendments to ensure
that this body and other relevant representatives of the Aboriginal
community are consulted in all developments in the area bounded by
Eveleigh, Caroline, Lewis and Vine streets in Redfern.
The transfer of the Redfern-Waterloo Authority into the Sydney
Metropolitan Development Authority allows the positive innovation in
residential and cultural developments in the Redfern-Waterloo area to
promote similar advances in the Sydney area. This will allow the Sydney
Metropolitan Development Authority to further enhance its ability to
promote urban renewal through developments such as the remaining lots of
land at the iconic Australian Technology Park site. That will give this
innovative precinct greater critical mass. Against this background we
see the proposed amendments as endorsing and continuing the good work
and planning already put in place by the previous Labor Government.
We support the amendments of the Growth Centres (Development
Corporations) Act 1974 and the repeal of the existing Redfern-Waterloo
Authority Act 2004 to transfer its assets and the majority of its
functions to the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority. As I lead in
debate for the Opposition I reiterate that the Opposition supports this
bill. It is continuing the work that Labor began in government. It was
always our intention to move the Redfern-Waterloo Authority into the
Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority.
Mr BART BASSETT (Londonderry) [5.32 p.m.]: I support this bill
which will repeal the Redfern-Waterloo Authority Act 2004 and amend the
Growth Centres (Development Corporations) Act 1974 to transfer the
responsibilities and assets of the authority to the Sydney Metropolitan
Development Authority. As a former mayor, I have firsthand experience of
the Growth Centres (Development Corporations) Act and endorse the
provisions in that Act. During my time as the Mayor of Hawkesbury City
Council I sat on the local government advisory panel for the Northwest
Growth Centres Commission that was formed under the Act. While that
commission had a mandate different from the mandate for
Redfern-Waterloo—it dealt mainly with land planning issues and
greenfields sites—the fundamentals and planning mechanisms were the same
as the Redfern-Waterloo Authority that was established to guide urban
renewal of the precinct.
The Growth Centres Commission was a mixed bag that could be best
described as good in parts but an overall failure because it was only a
bandaid solution to a bigger and deeper problem—the planning framework
in New South Wales. The standalone statutory bodies were not properly
resourced and did not get the support and leadership from government and
the administrative instrumentalities through the different Acts and
regulations that were required to fulfil its mandate. It was a good idea
with some outcomes but, like most things, it ended up an overall
failure and was consigned to the planning reform graveyard.
The former Government set up the administrative architecture to
implement the metropolitan strategy. The North West Growth Centres
Commission and the South West Growth Centres Commission were established
as part of this structure, as well as the Sydney Metropolitan
Development Authority, which was established in 2010 and which started
to assume responsibility for the Redfern-Waterloo Authority. This was
meant to cut through the labyrinth of red tape and bring about a
coordinated approach between multiple stakeholders, government agencies,
local government, the development industry and landowners to ensure
that effective management, proper consultation and communications of the
strategy were done in a comprehensive yet timely and efficient manner
so new release areas could be rolled out in a realistic time frame. At
the time these reforms were seen as a step in the right direction. To be
fair, there were some improvements in coordination and communication
between the Department of Planning and stakeholders and progress was
made.
However, like anything without leadership—from the elected government
through to the responsible Ministers and a planning framework that
backed up reforms with the tools and resources needed to do the job
properly—the reforms ended up, like a lot of others that preceded it, as
nothing other than add-ons that got in the way and that defeated the
original charter and objectives by causing added delays. It was a case
of a good idea with poor implementation. The Redfern-Waterloo Authority
was established in 2004 by the former Minister Frank Sartor and reported
directly to the Minister. To be fair, in my opinion the idea was well
intentioned. It was intended to provide the leadership necessary to cut
through red tape and achieve a realistic outcome that allowed for
increased densities as part of the renewal of a historic precinct while
respecting and protecting the environment and heritage components in the
precinct.
Like the North West Growth Centres Commission and the South West Growth
Centres Commission, the Redfern-Waterloo Authority sounded like a good
idea that would achieve a balanced outcome in a realistic time frame. I
know from my experience with the north-west growth centres and from
dealing with applications that there is too much red tape, buck passing
and indecision that results in unnecessary delay and poor planning
outcomes that do not take key issues into consideration, such as
transport, infrastructure, open space and access. For new South Wales to
become the economic driver of Australia we must ensure there is a
proper rollout of new residential, industrial, commercial and employment
developments, and supporting infrastructure.
In creating bodies such as the Redfern-Waterloo Authority and the North
West Growth Centres Commission and South West Growth Centres Commission
the Government tried to bypass the malaise created by the existing
planning framework, but it did not work. The former Government had
already abolished those commissions. I endorse the action to abolish the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority and to transfer its responsibility to the
Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority. This action is necessary as
the new Government has embarked on a full and comprehensive review of
the planning framework, and all aspects should be considered as part of
this review. For the reasons that I have outlined, I congratulate the
Minister on his work and commend the bill to the House.
Ms KRISTINA KENEALLY (Heffron) [5.36 p.m.]: I support the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority Repeal Bill 2011. Unlike the member for
Londonderry, I have been to Redfern and Waterloo. In fact, I represent
that area in this Chamber. I will speak about this bill not only as the
local member but also as someone who has held the portfolio of Redfern
and Waterloo in Cabinet. It might seem a bit odd for a local member to
support a bill repealing an authority that was designed specifically to
provide services and urban renewal to an area within her electorate.
Indeed, in 2004 I spoke strongly in support of the Redfern-Waterloo
Authority Bill and I note that the bill received bipartisan support. But
we are now repealing this authority, as was always our intention. The
Redfern-Waterloo Authority was never intended to be a permanent
government bureaucracy. It was not set up to live forever; it was set up
to drive urban renewal, employment, education and environmental
planning for Redfern and Waterloo.
The Labor Government announced in February last year that it would
create the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority and it created that
body. It announced then that the Redfern-Waterloo Authority, which had
been a successful example of driving urban renewal in those two suburbs,
would be expanded to become the broader focused Sydney Metropolitan
Development Authority. The new authority was created and the new board
was established under the previous Labor Government. It was always
intended that the Redfern-Waterloo Authority would evolve and enlarge
into the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority. As was intended by
the previous Labor Government, and as will happen under this
legislation, the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority will continue
to play the key role of driving renewal within Redfern and Waterloo. A
number of projects that are extremely important for the area are still
on the boil.
I want to look back to 2004 and highlight some matters. At that time I
was the member for Heffron but the electorate only covered the suburb of
Waterloo; it expanded to cover the suburb of Redfern after the 2007
redistribution. In 2004 when I spoke in this Parliament 95 per cent of
public housing residents in Waterloo received income support from the
Government. That means 95 per cent of people did not get up and go to
work every day. Fifty-one per cent of households in Waterloo earned less
than $399 per week compared with 20 per cent for the rest of Sydney.
The unemployment rate in 2004 was 16.6 per cent, almost triple the
figure for the rest of Sydney at the time. Indeed, there were 2,000
units of public housing in Waterloo then, which represented 67 per cent
of dwellings in the suburb. Waterloo had been ranked in 2003 in the top 5
per cent of the most disadvantaged postcodes in New South Wales in a
report entitled "Communities of Advantage and Disadvantage" prepared by
Professor Tony Vinson.
In recounting those statistics I do not mean to portray Waterloo as a
difficult or indeed a dangerous place. There was a resilience and a
strong community spirit in that suburb. As someone who regularly visits
the high-rise public housing towers, stands on street corners holding
mobile offices and doorknocks the area I can say I have never felt
threatened; I have always felt welcomed. The people of Waterloo face
enormous daily challenges. In 2004 they wanted a healthier and safer
community and a better social mix. That indeed was what the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority was designed to deliver.
The authority was designed to promote the economic and social
development of its operational area. It was required to prepare and
implement a Redfern-Waterloo plan and it was specifically required to
promote and coordinate the orderly economic development and use of the
operational area, including the development and management of land,
provision of infrastructure and the establishment of public areas. It
was to provide and promote housing choices in Redfern and Waterloo as
well as provide and promote employment opportunities for local
residents. Importantly, it was to promote and coordinate cultural,
educational, commercial, recreational, entertainment and transport
activities and facilities in Redfern-Waterloo. It was also to have
development and management control over sites deemed to be of State
significance by the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning.
Having recounted those original aims of the Redfern-Waterloo Authority
Bill, I turn to some of the things that have occurred in Redfern and
Waterloo since 2004. Many members may have visited the Redfern and
Waterloo premier markets, the Eveleigh Farmers Market, which won the Sydney Morning Herald
2010 Foodies Guide Award for best markets in Sydney, having been
operating for only seven months at the time. Of course, at The Block the
Pemulwuy project received approval for its development in July 2009,
something I was proud to do as Minister for Planning. In March 2010 my
Government provided the Aboriginal Housing Company with a $2 million
grant to kick off the development of that project.
The National Centre of Indigenous Excellence was established at the
former Redfern Public School site. It is worth noting that one of the
first things that occurred under the previous Labor Government was the
closure of several schools in South Sydney and the establishment of the
Alexandria Park Community School, a K-12 school, which has seen
enrolment and attendance in education in South Sydney rise
significantly. There have been some remarkable outcomes from Alexandria
Park Community School. The Redfern Public School site was sold to the
Indigenous Land Corporation and the Natural Centre of Indigenous
Excellence opened there.
A specialist health centre for Redfern opened at the former courthouse
site. That was funded through the sale of the Rachel Forster Hospital.
That centre, which is run by Sydney South West Area Health Service,
provides a range of services including mental health, drug and alcohol,
HIV services and others to the local community. Channel 7 has relocated
to Eveleigh along with Pacific Publishing, bringing some 2,000 jobs to
the area. We have also seen movies being made at CarriageWorks as a
result of the work that has been done by the Redfern-Waterloo Authority,
again bringing job opportunities and economic activity.
I particularly mention two services—Yaama Dhiyaan, which is a
hospitality training course specialising in Indigenous food and culture,
which has had remarkable success. More than 129 graduates have gone
through that program, 79 graduates have been employed and another nine
have gone on to further education. That program, which is run by Aunty
Beryl Van-Oploo, does a remarkable job. Another service that has been
set up as a result of the work of the Redfern-Waterloo Authority and its
focus on employment is the Les Tobler apprentice centre, which is run
by Rowan Tobler, who has won a number of awards. Again, they have had a
remarkable success rate placing many Aboriginal apprentices in jobs.
By consent, General Business Notices of Motions (General Notices) postponed to permit the conclusion of the current debate.
Ms KRISTINA KENEALLY: The Les Tobler centre has had remarkable
success in placing Aboriginal construction apprentices in jobs,
particularly with the Channel 7 development and the redevelopment of
housing on Elizabeth Street, Redfern, which is providing 100 new units
of public housing. It is a beautiful housing development. I was there
recently to rename the community centre after Betty Makin, an elder who
is well known for her support of young people in the area. The
redevelopment of the Elizabeth Street site is another commitment by the
Government to the revitalisation of Redfern and Waterloo.
We also have seen a commitment to the Waterloo Green Neighbourhood
Project, which is a $12 million three-year program providing
concierge-style front desk staff, on-the-ground maintenance teams and
extra security measures for six Waterloo high-rise public housing
buildings. My constituents are quite pleased with the success of that
project. They are also very pleased that, through collaborative work
between the Redfern-Waterloo Authority and the Department of Housing, we
have been able to implement alcohol-free zones in public housing land
in Waterloo and tackle what has been a difficult problem for residents
for many years.
The Roll Up Redfern group, which brings together the City of Sydney—I
acknowledge the Lord Mayor is in the Chamber today—and the
Redfern-Waterloo Chamber of Commerce, Redwatch and Souths Cares, an
organisation on whose board I sit, are doing terrific work to change the
perception of Redfern, launching Brand Redfern and working in
particular to ensure that Redfern sheds its reputation as a suburb where
the shutters come down at night. Anyone who has been on Redfern Street
or Regent Street at night knows what I mean. Indeed, if you go down
those streets now you see a much more vibrant Redfern.
The Heritage Taskforce that has been set up by the Redfern-Waterloo
Authority is looking in particular at protecting heritage in the
Eveleigh rail yards areas. I could go on and on talking about youth
services such as the wonderful South Sydney Youth Services, which does
excellent work and has run a number of successful programs, and the
midnight basketball program, which has worked well. The police have done
remarkable work particularly with Mundine's boxing gym. Last year we
saw a significant drop in crime in Redfern and Waterloo and a
significant rise in housing prices. Indeed, housing prices in the area
rose by 38 per cent between 2005 and 2009, having climbed by 12 per cent
in 2009 alone despite the global financial crisis.
I mentioned that the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority needs to
continue its work in Redfern and Waterloo, particularly around Redfern
town centre and the redevelopment of Redfern station, as well as its
long-term plans for the revitalisation and rezoning of public housing
estates in Redfern and Waterloo. I encourage the Government to maintain
the commitment made by the Labor Government to sustain the levels of
public, social, community and affordable housing in those two suburbs.
Significant work still needs to be done, and I look forward to that work
being done by the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority.
I commenced this speech by remarking that the Sydney Metropolitan
Development Authority is an initiative of the former Labor Government.
It was announced in February as part of the Metropolitan Transport Plan.
Subsequently it was incorporated into the Sydney Metropolitan Plan. The
Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority will assume the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority's functions and use that authority as a model
for all of Sydney. On this point I acknowledge that the Minister for
Planning, the Hon. Brad Hazzard, has taken up an initiative of the
Keneally Government, particularly when it comes to the development of
Sydney and urban planning. He has taken up that initiative in retaining
the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority, and maintaining the
successful model of the Redfern-Waterloo Authority and taking that
forward.
It should be acknowledge that the Minister has picked up and run with
the Labor Government's vision on how Sydney should be developed,
particularly in respect of urban renewal and transport-orientated
development. I look forward to seeing how the Sydney Metropolitan
Development Authority in particular incorporates the Premier's
commitment to a 50:50 split between infill and urban development, a move
away from the previous Labor Government's policy of 70 per cent infill
and 30 per cent greenfields. That will be a challenge for the Sydney
Metropolitan Development Authority, and I look forward to seeing how it
meets that challenge. I look forward also to the Minister visiting
Redfern and Waterloo. I know he did so in June 2011, because it was
breathlessly announced by the Factory Community Centre that the Minister
was given a tour of Redfern and Waterloo. It is both remarkable and
wonderful that the Minister has chosen to visit those suburbs. We look
forward to his coming back.
Mr MARK SPEAKMAN (Cronulla) [5.51 p.m.]: I support the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority Repeal Bill 2011. The bill will repeal the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority Act 2004 and amend the Growth Centres
(Development Corporations) Act 1974. The Sydney Metropolitan Development
Authority was established last year to drive the development of
high-quality urban precincts, the initial precincts being
Redfern-Waterloo, which includes the Australian Technology Park, and
Granville. But, in the meantime, the Redfern-Waterloo Authority has
continued to carry out its functions. This continued operation has
disadvantages, including a requirement to perform duplicate
administrative functions, with overheads and reporting obligations.
This bill will dissolve the Redfern-Waterloo Authority. Its assets,
rights, liabilities and some of its functions will be transferred to the
Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority. Sole membership of
Australian Technology Park Sydney Limited will transfer from the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority to the Sydney Metropolitan Development
Authority, so the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority can
undertake immediate urban renewal on remaining development lots of the
Australian Technology Park. The Redfern-Waterloo Authority Fund will be
transferred to the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority. Provisions
of the Redfern-Waterloo Authority Act which relate to the levying of
development contributions for development at sites in Redfern and
Waterloo and at the former Carlton United Breweries site at Broadway
will continue.
The Aboriginal Housing Company and representatives of the Aboriginal
community will continue to be consulted in relation to the area known as
The Block. The bill will end the switching off of the Heritage Act
provisions within the Redfern-Waterloo area. The bill provides for
transitional arrangements for the Redfern-Waterloo Plan as an approved
scheme under the Growth Centres Act, and this will allow the Sydney
Metropolitan Development Authority to undertake the key renewal
strategies outlined in the plan. I commend the bill to the House.
Ms CLOVER MOORE (Sydney) [5.54 p.m.]: I will make a brief
contribution on the Redfern-Waterloo Authority Repeal Bill 2011: a more
comprehensive contribution is not possible given the bill was introduced
only this afternoon. When the Redfern-Waterloo Authority legislation
was introduced in this House I represented Redfern, which was in the
electorate of Bligh. Both Redfern and Waterloo are in the City of Sydney
local government area. At the time I opposed the legislation because it
gave the Minister unfettered power to approve development with the
accountability and normal checks and balances that apply with local
government assessments removed. The local community was alarmed that the
legislation was only about ensuring land development and not about
urban renewal or addressing social issues in the Redfern-Waterloo area
or The Block.
There was widespread concern that the community would have little say in
how their neighbourhood was changed. The City of Sydney has long been
committed to working with the State Government to address the urban
renewal and social issues in Redfern-Waterloo. I welcome changes this
month that handed to the city approvals for developments valued at less
than $10 million. This will ensure that the majority of development
proposals will be subject to the city's rigorous assessment processes
and community consultation. Indeed, all development should be able to be
assessed by the city because the Central Sydney Planning Committee
deals with development worth over $50 million and has a greater number
of State government appointees than it does city appointees. I maintain
that developments above $10 million should go to the city instead of the
Minister for Planning.
The city's submission to the recent draft Built Environment Plan No. 2
broadly supported the latest proposed rezoning with the recommendation
that development only occur if a train station is built in Waterloo,
which of course would provide public transport for the proposed increase
in population that is possible given the route of the city to the
airport railway runs directly underneath. I understand that the Sydney
Metropolitan Development Authority will be required to report to the
Minister for Planning, who will determine what instrument is the most
appropriate for rezoning the area. Plan-making should be done through
the comprehensive City Plan process, which will assess the area
holistically as part of the entire inner city and with the city
consulting closely with the local community.
The Central Sydney Planning Committee has the capacity and expertise to
establish the most appropriate zoning for the inner city, and creating
new bodies to take on this role is wasteful duplication. I have long
opposed areas of the city being excised from the city, the creation of
qangos, and the divvying up of the City of Sydney to various bodies,
such as the Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority. There should be an
integrated and coordinated approach to the city, and I will make that
case to the Minister when the Sydney Metropolitan Development Authority
provides a report for Redfern-Waterloo plan making. The city will
continue to work with the Minister and the Government on this very
important urban renewal area.
Mr CRAIG BAUMANN (Port Stephens—Parliamentary Secretary) [5.56
p.m.], in reply: I thank the members for Canterbury, Londonderry,
Cronulla and Sydney for their contributions. I particularly thank the
member for Heffron, who made her third contribution in this Parliament
and her second today. That is good because it enables the new
backbenchers to see the former Premier in action. As indicated, the
Redfern-Waterloo Authority Repeal Bill is an important step in the
ongoing renewal of the Redfern-Waterloo area. Through this bill the
Government is ensuring the ongoing commitment to the renewal of this
important area of Sydney and New South Wales. The bill reflects the
ongoing reforms that this Government has introduced to the New South
Wales planning system. I commend the bill to the House.
Question—That this bill be now agreed to in principle—put and resolved in the affirmative.
Motion agreed to.
Bill agreed to in principle.
Bill declared passed and transmitted to the Legislative Council with a message seeking its concurrence in the bill.
Source: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LA20111018035?open&refNavID=HA8_1
See Minister Hazzards Speech: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LA20111018032?open&refNavID=HA8_1