Rachel Forster site community meeting

With virtually no reference to the existing buildings, the current proposal was compared to the plans approved under the Redfern-Waterloo Act of the previous NSW government. As there had been very little consultation with the community in the development of these plans, the comparison had little meaning. Diagrams outlining the existing buildings – which the community know well – would have enabled a much better understanding of what is intended.

The consultants noted that the current plans generally complied with the Approval, with the “minor” exceptions of: An additional 9 apartments achieved through removing the crossover apartments (which enable good cross ventilation); The removal of all 3 bedroom apartments (which the consultants did not seem to realise); A change to the north-east corner of the building resulting in the removal of the jacaranda tree; A reduction in the setback of the upper floor from Pitt Street; An increase in the size of the balconies to the south, overlooking the neighbouring houses.

Also of great concern was the current management of the site – or lack thereof. Significantly, it was noted that the “security” measures are totally ineffectual, resulting in the occupation by approximately 20 squatters who, amongst other things, are throwing dangerous asbestos into the neighbouring properties and ignoring the theft of copper downpipes and gutters (essential for the retention of the existing buildings) by those appointed by the developers to “secure” the premises (now not working for them as they noted).

The developers, who sat unacknowledged at the back of the room and were absent at many crucial points, seemed disinterested in these issues, except to point out they were doing all that was required.

It was obvious that for any development in this suburb, that has a great past and a strong future, consultation with the community is essential. This will harness their experience and knowledge in bringing local relevance and buy-in to any scheme. It will also bring great financial advantage to the developers who will benefit from this free intelligence to produce a product that will be well received by potential purchasers, while reducing the time for consideration and approval. Failure to recognise this will see the opposite, as this strident community stands up for what this great place deserves.

For More information on this issue and the current proposals visit the REDWatch sites section on the Former Rachel Forster Hospital